Back then, Uniswap outcompeted Curve because Uni is very well gas optimized, which played out a crucial role on Ethereum mainnet. Despite better pricing on Curve, trades were routed to Uni as the difference in gas fees has more impact than the execution.

Launching on L2s did not help Curve to get more volumes as bootstrapping initial liquidity on L2s was too complicated, which did not allow them to gain a meaningful market share there.

Swaps on Fluid DEX are also a bit (~20%) more expensive in terms of gas which leads to routing some of the volumes in the low-fee tier pools to Uni, instead of Fluid. So how won't Fluid repeat Curve's destiny?

On L2s, gas prices are not an issue and Fluid DEX will perform even better than it does on Ethereum while bootstrapping liquidity is not a problem for Fluid DEX since it is built on top of the same Fluid Liquidity Layer and taps into the existing $60m market.

And every new market and protocol that is built on top of Fluid contributes to and utilizes the same liquidity. For example, ETH supply on Fluid on Ethereum increased by approx $100m after we launched the DEX. Fluid on @arbitrum will experience the same growth over time.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。