Since its birth in 2009, Bitcoin has experienced multiple forks, resulting in new cryptocurrencies and variations of the original protocol. As of May 2024, there have been over 100 Bitcoin forks, each with varying degrees of adoption and success.
Author: Kiara Taylor, Bitcoin Magazine
Translation: Wuzhu, Golden Finance
Since its birth in 2009, Bitcoin has experienced multiple forks, resulting in new cryptocurrencies and variations of the original protocol. As of May 2024, there have been over 100 Bitcoin forks, each with varying degrees of adoption and success.
These forks have sparked intense debates within the cryptocurrency community. Some view them as catalysts for innovation and progress, while others see them as disruptive forces that undermine network stability and core values.
This dichotomy is the focus of our discussion today. We will explore the reasons behind these forks, their achievements, and what they mean for the future of Bitcoin.
Major Bitcoin Forks and Their Impact
Despite the lack of cohesion in the nascent Bitcoin community, progress has been made in realizing Satoshi Nakamoto's vision. However, the first crack appeared with the birth of Bitcoin XT in 2014, leading to the first significant fracture in the community and providing valuable lessons in governance.
This cryptocurrency split occurred because developers wanted to increase the block size from 1 megabyte to 8 megabytes, a move that was deemed excessive by others. This led to the birth of Bitcoin Classic with a 2MB block size (now defunct), followed by Bitcoin Unlimited, which took the opposite direction with massive 16MB blocks.
Subsequently, there were some truly influential forks whose impact continues to this day. These include:
Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) was created on August 1, 2017, as a result of a hard fork of Bitcoin. The primary motivation for this fork was to address Bitcoin's scalability issues, particularly the slow transaction times and high fees caused by the 1MB block size limit.
Supporters of Bitcoin Cash, including influential figures like Roger Ver, believed that increasing the block size would allow each block to process more transactions, thereby reducing fees and speeding up transaction times.
Bitcoin Cash quickly gained attention upon its creation and was adopted by multiple exchanges and merchants. Its value also experienced an initial surge, reaching a significant market capitalization.
Over time, Bitcoin Cash continued to evolve, undergoing ongoing development and updates aimed at improving its functionality and scalability. It has a dedicated community of supporters who believe in its potential as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
However, it faces competition from other cryptocurrencies that also aim to provide low fees and fast transaction times. Today, the debate over scalability and transaction fees continues to influence the direction and development of Bitcoin Cash.
Bitcoin SV (BSV)
Bitcoin SV (Satoshi Vision) emerged on November 15, 2018, following a fierce disagreement within the Bitcoin Cash community, particularly regarding further increases in block size and development direction. The project was spearheaded by Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre, who aimed to restore what they believed to be Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision for Bitcoin.
Bitcoin SV significantly increased the block size limit, initially to 128MB and later to 2GB, allowing for greater transaction volume. Supporters of BSV believe that large block sizes are necessary to support enterprise-level applications and high transaction throughput.
However, the significant increase in block size also raised concerns about centralization, as running full nodes became more resource-intensive.
Bitcoin SV remains a controversial fork within the broader Bitcoin and cryptocurrency community. It focuses on large block sizes and high transaction throughput, making it stand out among major cryptocurrencies. However, it continues to face ongoing challenges in gaining widespread acceptance, with Coinbase ultimately permanently delisting it in 2023.
Bitcoin Gold (BTG)
Bitcoin Gold was created on October 24, 2017, with the aim of decentralizing Bitcoin mining. It achieved this by changing the mining algorithm from Bitcoin's SHA-256 to Equihash, which is more resistant to ASIC mining.
This change aimed to make mining BTG more accessible to individuals using regular GPUs, reducing the dominance of large mining farms and truly democratizing token mining.
Bitcoin Gold uses the Equihash algorithm, designed to consume significant memory and resist ASIC mining hardware. This fork aimed to democratize mining by making it easier for individuals to mine.
Bitcoin Gold initially received enthusiastic support and was adopted by multiple exchanges. However, it faced security challenges, including a major 51% attack in 2018, resulting in double-spending of $70,000.
Today, Bitcoin Gold continues to exist as a smaller player in the cryptocurrency market. While it has struggled to achieve the same adoption and market share as Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV, its focus on distributed mining remains its primary feature.
Motivations Behind Bitcoin Forks
Bitcoin forks have occurred for various reasons, driven by ideological, technical, and economic motivations.
For example, one of the primary drivers of Bitcoin forks is the need to address scalability issues. As Bitcoin gained popularity, the network faced challenges in processing an increasing number of transactions, leading to longer confirmation times and higher fees.
Forks have also been initiated to introduce technical improvements or new features to the Bitcoin protocol. These may include changes to the consensus mechanism, enhanced privacy features, or the introduction of smart contract functionality.
In some cases, personal motivations, such as power struggles, ideological differences, or financial incentives, have contributed to the creation of Bitcoin forks. If you look at the historical fluctuations of forks like Bitcoin SV and Bitcoin Cash, you'll find that some view them as investment opportunities.
For example, Bitcoin Cash, which split from Bitcoin in August 2017, saw its price soar to around $4,355 shortly after its establishment in December 2017. However, it later stabilized and traded in the range of $200 to $500 over the following years.
Impacts of Major Forks on Bitcoin
In addition to the obvious impact of increasing the threat to OG BTC, major forks have had tangible and intangible effects on the entire cryptocurrency community. While these forks have not become legitimate solutions to cash flow issues, their impact persists.
Market Volatility
Bitcoin forks often lead to intensified market volatility. For example, the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) fork in August 2017 resulted in significant price fluctuations for both Bitcoin and the newly created Bitcoin Cash. Prior to the fork, Bitcoin's price was around $2,800, but immediately dropped to $2,700 after the fork. On the other hand, Bitcoin Cash started trading at around $555.
Similarly, the price of Bitcoin SV (BSV), which split from Bitcoin Cash in 2018, also experienced substantial fluctuations. In January 2020, BSV reached a peak of around $441.20, but by June 2024, its price had dropped to approximately $63. These fluctuations are often driven by investor speculation and market manipulation, with some viewing these forks as opportunities for financial gain.
Network Scalability and Development
Forks have sparked significant debates and developments regarding Bitcoin's scalability.
The original Bitcoin network had limitations such as a 1MB block size and 10-minute block creation time, which affected its transaction throughput. As mentioned earlier, these limitations led to the creation of Bitcoin Cash, which increased the block size to 8MB to process more transactions per block.
Forks have highlighted the need for scalability solutions, prompting various projects and protocols to enhance Bitcoin's transaction capabilities. A prominent example is the Lightning Network, a second-layer solution designed to facilitate faster and cheaper transactions by creating off-chain payment channels.
Security Concerns
Some forks have introduced security vulnerabilities. For example, the lower hash rate and interest in Bitcoin SV made it more susceptible to 51% attacks, where malicious actors could control a majority of the network's mining power, jeopardizing its security.
Unfortunately, this has raised long-term concerns about the viability and security of certain Bitcoin forks. If organized malicious actors can so easily seize control, what is the point of further forking?
Conclusion
As the cryptocurrency market matures and increasingly integrates with traditional financial systems, the impact of Bitcoin forks on the broader economy cannot be underestimated. The success or failure of these forks will not only affect individual investors and businesses but may also have implications for the stability and security of the global financial infrastructure.
Ultimately, the future of Bitcoin and its forks will depend on whether the community can find common ground and work towards realizing a shared vision of a decentralized, inclusive, and resilient financial system.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
